1 for 4 - 4 for 1
2000, Elegant Angel

Reviewed By: P.T.
On: 05/17/00
Produced by: Alex Ladd
Directed by: Alex Ladd
Starring: Georgette Neale, Nicole, Tracy, Salma Lee, Sonia Lee, Ian Tate, Kris Knight, Mario Rossi, Biff, Dan Stallion, Tony Pacino, Storm, Karl Kinkade
Directing: 2
Production: 2
Storyline: 2
Music: 3
Editing: 3
Costumes: 3
Dialogue: 2


 

The Sex Index ©
Georgette Neale with Dan Stallion, Karl Kinkade, Storm and Biff X X   X X X X   X    
Nicole with Karl, Storm, Ian Tate and Mario Rossi       X   X   X    
Tracy with Mario Rossi, Ian Tate, Dan Stallion and Kris Knight X   X X   X        
Salma Lee with Karl Kinkade, Ian Tate, Kris Knight and Storm       X   X   X    
Sonia Lee with Tony Pacino, Storm, Ian Tate and Kris Knight X   X X   X        


 

Review:
1 for 4, no 4 for 1. The theme of this series is scenes with a girl and four guys or four girls and one guy. They never did the four girls with one guy and it's probably just as well. A guy has a hard enough time with two girls, and some can handle three, but with four, the girls end up having to take care of each other for the most part. Even the scenes here mostly showed two or three guys with the girl, it's just hard to find a place for the fourth fella. The boys had to rotate in, with one on the bench in reserve.

The five scenes in the video total over two hours. There's men in bondage, the little school girl, the maid, the bath and room service. The girls aren't big-named knockouts, but they are enthusiastic and get into the action whole heartedly. The studs are Ok, but nothing to brag about, they show very little passion or imagination. Production wasn't that good, the directing was so-so, the audio was sub-standard and the dialogue was weak. This movie had all the trademarks of being thrown together without enough planning. The cheesy, predictable little skits made me think I was watching a 70's release. The camera work was good and Ladd did a respectable job of capturing the action.

I'm not a big fan of European films, they either get dubbed, subtitled or left the way they are and I don't get the feeling for the movie that was intended. Even though this is in English, the audio was so poor, with echoes and low volume that it was hard for me to understand what was being said. When I could hear, the thick accents went by me. I wasn't impressed by the presentation of the film's concept or the writing. Maybe it should be 1 for 3 - 3 for 1. Ladd should leave the writing and production to someone else and stick to working the camera. The camera work and girls carry this flick. I also think that if you are going to identify the girls in the opening credits, you should do the same for the guys. Of course, if you're using rent-a-studs instead of actual performers it doesn't matter. But, you get what you pay for.

PT says 3, not 4, 3!!!

© 2000 Smuttco, Inc.